Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Adams (artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:11, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Adams (artist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The artist does not meet the general notability criteria as there's not in-depth coverage of him in reliable sources. He also fails the more specific notability criteria laid out at WP:ARTIST. Diannaa (talk) 01:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although this is a pseudonym for two people, it is effectively a double biography of living people. The article is entirely unreferenced, which is contrary to BLP policy. Several works are listed as "internet projects" which are self-promotional efforts which do not establish notability. The other solo exhibitions are commercial gallery showings, not museum exhibits. Although the very common name complicates searches, I do not see evidence so far that this artist duo is notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 05:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 16:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 10:37, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks sufficient references to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.